The technologies used to reduce toxic pollution also reduce sulfur dioxide and fine particle poll...
Public Lab is an open community which collaboratively develops accessible, open source, Do-It-Yourself technologies for investigating local environmental health and justice issues.
All topics »
If you cannot use the ReCaptcha to verify you are not a bot, use this alternative verification.
As an open source community, we believe in open licensing of content so that other members of the community can leverage your work legally -- with attribution, of course. By joining the Public Lab site, you agree to release the content you post here under a Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike license, and the hardware designs you post under the CERN Open Hardware License 1.1 (full text). This has the added benefit that others must share their improvements in turn with you.
sign up to join the Public Lab community
Forgot your password? Reset it here
by paris_smith |
April 27, 2021 19:50 |
The technologies used to reduce toxic pollution also reduce sulfur dioxide and fine particle pollution, with additional benefits for public heath.
Please help my school with our studies in trying to find out how to change the problem of bad air quality.
Reply to this comment...
Log in to comment
The EPA has a model for this, called BENMAP-CE, where you can calculate economic benefits of reducing different kinds of air pollution, like you mention. But it's complicated! I haven't been trained on it. I'm sure, if you search the research behind it, that there are studies that will discuss what you're looking for.
Co-Benefits Risk Assessment Screening Model (COBRA)- This as a screening tool that helps U.S. states and localities estimate the health and related economic benefits of changes in emissions of directly-emitted PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors.
Public health gains that have been made through pollution control is having good respiratory health.
This is part of: